Health Systems Administration Essay Example

Health Systems Administration Essay Example Health Systems Administration Paper Health Systems Administration Paper Health care organizations operate to offer quality services at minimal costs. Excessive costs would work to increase the financial losses that such organizations face. Establishing effective strategies and reassessing the current approach would suffice in ensuring such costs are contained. New subsystems can be implemented to ensure sustainability of the current health care delivery market. Leadership is considered a very complex phenomenon that entails diversified roles. Leaders are expected to be in a capacity to influence and persuade for the benefit of an organization or a firm that a leader is working for. They create conducive environment where change can be incorporated and they can act as catalyst in the change process. Leaders can influence those under them to embrace change and this would translate to people accepting such a change. They are influential in the society. Leaders also perform the ‘representative’ role in organizations or whichever areas they are in. they represent the group fraternity where they lead and can be used to communicate the group’s interests, concerns or complain. Group’s members entrust their leaders to represent them to the larger societies (Ferrand P. 2006). In order to achieve their responsibilities or functions leaders ought to have in themselves and are in a position to inspire confidence. Strong self image works to positively affect one’s communication skills a very crucial aspect in leadership. To be able to persuade and influence the group members leaders must have a vision for the future and they must have solid belief in the organizational goals. Without these goals it would be hard for them to influence people. Internalizing such goals would work to motivate the leaders in their duties. Leaders ought to have the ability to coordinate activities in the group respectively and they should not coerce people to do things. Leaders can adopt different leadership styles depending on their personal interests or interests of the majority. They could opt for autocratic, bureaucratic participative, laissez-faire or paternalistic leadership (Silcox N. 2006). An autocratic leader offers close supervision to those under him or her. This kind of leadership does not allow for employees point of view as the leader gives the direction to be followed in a clear or precise conditions. Such kind of leadership offers little if any motivation for the employees. Employees feel alienated under such leadership as they are not included in running process of the group or organization. This kind of leadership sounds very exploitative as all decisions are one way. Bureaucratic leadership entails following to the letter the procedures, rules, and policies that have been set. It ensures minimal employee freedom as it works to ensure that accepted rules are followed. Institutions rules and policies are given priority in this arrangement (Silcox N, 2006). Participative leadership values group ideology and group contribution is highly appreciated and emphasized. Employees retention and motivation is greatly achieved as they are involved in the decision making of the greatly achieved as they are involved in the decision making of the organization. Employees feel that they are part and parcel of the organization since they are consulted on the organizations goals and objectives. The Laissez-faire leadership entails autonomous leadership where individuals are given the chance to lead themselves and only consult the leaders when need arises. There is little supervision and individuals are perceived to be self motivated and hence can perform duties on their own. However this kind of leadership leads to disorganization and chaos in the organization due to lack of effective leadership. Quality of output produced may be negatively affected. Â  Paternalistic leadership entails viewing the employees as inadequate and hence cannot be entrusted to make decisions. They become independent on the leader who acts like a dictator. To react to emergencies the employees have to want on their leaders who may be far causing delayed decision making. Their motivation is also negatively affected (Silcox N, 2006).